Is that a mistake?

[VacantJoy]

I found out that in the history of acclaimed music in the update section there are two lists ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2002-02-17 and ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2003-12-16 which seems the same to me.I end up to this because i went to check if Top 100 Albums of the 1990s-https://pitchfork.com/features/lists-an ... the-1990s/ list has been added over the years...can anyone help clarify this ?

[Elder]

I found out that in the history of acclaimed music in the update section there are two lists ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2002-02-17 and ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2003-12-16 which seems the same to me.I end up to this because i went to check if Top 100 Albums of the 1990s-https://pitchfork.com/features/lists-an ... the-1990s/ list has been added over the years...can anyone help clarify this ?

I think it's the same list, the pitchfork only took first place from Pavement and gave it to Radiohead

[VacantJoy]

I found out that in the history of acclaimed music in the update section there are two lists ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2002-02-17 and ''Pitchfork (USA) - Top 100 Favorite Records of the 1990s (1999)'' added in 2003-12-16 which seems the same to me.I end up to this because i went to check if Top 100 Albums of the 1990s-https://pitchfork.com/features/lists-an ... the-1990s/ list has been added over the years...can anyone help clarify this ?

I think it's the same list, the pitchfork only took first place from Pavement and gave it to Radiohead

maybe henrik should interfere

[Henrik]

It’s two different lists, from 1999 and 2003. They are both used on AM but downweighted because they came out with little time between.

[VacantJoy]

It’s two different lists, from 1999 and 2003. They are both used on AM but downweighted because they came out with little time between.

henrik if you see the publication date for both of them,it's 1999,that means that there is a mistake on the year in one of them(1999 instead of 2003) or that you have used the same list two times

[Henrik]

It’s two different lists, from 1999 and 2003. They are both used on AM but downweighted because they came out with little time between.

henrik if you see the publication date for both of them,it's 1999,that means that there is a mistake on the year in one of them(1999 instead of 2003) or that you have used the same list two times

I think it’s just a mistake on the update page.

[VacantJoy]

It’s two different lists, from 1999 and 2003. They are both used on AM but downweighted because they came out with little time between.

henrik if you see the publication date for both of them,it's 1999,that means that there is a mistake on the year in one of them(1999 instead of 2003) or that you have used the same list two times

I think it’s just a mistake on the update page.

henrik it was before the update,you can see the day that i have made the thread
"edit" if you mean it's just a typographical error on the update history i am sorry,i misunderstood it...

[VacantJoy]

It’s two different lists, from 1999 and 2003. They are both used on AM but downweighted because they came out with little time between.

henrik if you see the publication date for both of them,it's 1999,that means that there is a mistake on the year in one of them(1999 instead of 2003) or that you have used the same list two times

I think it’s just a mistake on the update page.

the mistake is that it should say albums not records , i will add it to the 2020 errors