5 posts • Page 1 of 1
Last year it was the same, maybe they're a little tired after choosing nice albumsHarold wrote:A "top 100" list with 94 albums on it. Why do they even bother if they're not going to make the effort?
Not really a valid excuse for a website ostensibly run by professionals. I'm adding it to the spreadsheet, but I'm sorry, I get a little pissed when I see things like this. Maybe my standards are too high...discord wrote:Perhaps they lost count.